Standard for the prevention of violations of mandatory requirements. Approved the Standard for Comprehensive Prevention of Violations of Mandatory Requirements

The Ministry of Economic Development of Russia within the framework of the implementation of the passport of the priority program " Reform of control and supervisory activities » the Standard for Comprehensive Prevention of Violations of Mandatory Requirements was approved.

The main purpose of the Standard is to ensure the systematic implementation of preventive measures in the current activities of control and supervisory authorities. The adopted document summarizes the existing experience of preventive work of control and supervision departments, overseas experience and methodological developments.

The measures envisaged by the Standard are aimed at:

Prevention of violations of mandatory requirements;

Preventing the risk of harm and reducing the level of damage;

Elimination of conditions and causes that contribute to the violation of mandatory requirements and damage to legally protected values;

Formation of models of socially responsible, conscientious, legal behavior of controlled entities;

Increasing the transparency of the system of control and supervision activities.

In addition to the already existing preventive measures that are regulated federal law dated December 26, 2008 No. 294-FZ, the Standard provides for a number of new tools. These include measures aimed at:

Explanation of control procedures;

Incentive measures (informing about the results of control);

interactive services, mobile applications;

Pre-trial (out-of-court) appeal mechanism;

Transition from the list of legal acts to the list of mandatory requirements.

It should be noted that the Standard will be finalized and supplemented as legislation develops and the practice of applying preventive measures accumulates.

The Standard applies to all federal authorities that participate in the implementation of the program to reform the control and supervisory activities. In addition, the document can be used executive bodies state authorities and bodies local government subjects Russian Federation.

You can read the document by following the link: http://ar.gov.ru/files/library/1506421794.src.docx-d

Latest Tatarstan news on the topic:
Approved the Standard for Comprehensive Prevention of Violations of Mandatory Requirements

Roszdravnadzor took part in the conference "Reform of CND: first results and new challenges"- Kazan

Employees of the Central Office of Roszdravnadzor, headed by the head of the Service, Mikhail Murashko, took part in the two-day conference “Reform of the CND:
17:40 15.12.2017 Roszdravnadzor

Approved the Standard for Comprehensive Prevention of Violations of Mandatory Requirements- Kazan

The Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, as part of the implementation of the passport of the priority program "Reform of Control and Supervisory Activities", approved the Standard for Comprehensive Prevention of Violations of Mandatory Requirements.
11:41 15.12.2017 Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Tatarstan

The Deputy Director of the Department spoke about the Standard for Comprehensive Prevention of Violations of Mandatory Requirements, which was prepared in the course of the reform of control and supervision activities government controlled Ministry of Economic Development of Russia Anton LEBEDEV.

The activity of any control and supervisory body is not only inspections and fines, but also the prevention of violations. The inspector should not see potential violators in business entities. He must first of all assess the risks that the organization's activities bear, prevent them not only through inspections, but also by clarifying the legislation, informing controlled entities. To do this, you need to change the mentality of the inspectors.

It is this “service” model of control and supervisory activities that is laid down in the standard for the comprehensive prevention of violations of mandatory requirements. It was developed by the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia with the participation of the expert community as part of the implementation of the priority program "Reform of Control and Supervisory Activities".

The standard is the key to the development of "service" control in the medium term, therefore, in terms of content, it meets several basic principles.

First, it is the complexity of the standard. The document summarized the practical experience of carrying out preventive measures in Russia and abroad, as well as guidelines developed in the course of the reform of control and supervision activities.

Secondly, detail. The standard sets detailed requirements for the organization of preventive activities within control and oversight bodies.

Thirdly, illustration. The document contains in an accessible and understandable form concrete examples from the practice of foreign and Russian control and supervisory authorities.

Fourth, the prospects of the standard. It provides for new forms and tools of preventive work that are not spelled out in the current legislation, but do not contradict it. Each control and supervision body can choose the most optimal for itself, based on the specifics of the type of control it carries out and the state of the environment under control.

The standard should ensure the systematic implementation of preventive work in the activities of control and oversight bodies. It is important to move on to preventing violations of mandatory requirements, prevent the risk of harm and reduce the level of damage to legally protected values, as well as eliminate the causes of violations and form a model of socially responsible behavior of controlled entities.

Work on the prevention of violations is partially ongoing. Law "On the protection of rights legal entities and individual entrepreneurs in the implementation of state control (supervision) and municipal control” provides for the compilation of lists of legal acts containing mandatory requirements, informing controlled entities, holding seminars and regularly summarizing the practice of control and supervisory activities, including a description of typical and mass violations of mandatory requirements. The legislation also provides for the issuance of warnings about the inadmissibility of violations of mandatory requirements.

These tools are further developed in the standard. The document spells out how to approach the compilation of lists of violations, how to group them. This is due to the fact that typical and mass violations differ significantly not only depending on the type of control, but also on approaches to the classification of economic entities.

Further development in the standard is the institution of the so-called "check-lists" or, using the terminology of the legislation, lists control questions (checklists). The purpose of the "checklists" is to systematize the mandatory requirements for the needs of the control and supervisory activities. Due to their use, the controlled entity can get acquainted in advance with what will be assessed during the audit, what requirements can be applied specifically to its activities. Based on the "checklists", it is planned to introduce mechanisms for self-examination of economic entities for compliance of their activities with mandatory requirements. Rostrud has a similar experience as part of the on-line resource onlineinspection.rf.

In addition to existing prevention tools, the standard offers new solutions. This, for example, is an explanation of control procedures directly within the framework of an audit event. One of the possible forms is to hold an introductory meeting before the audit, at which it is reported on its content, timing, and individual procedural points. This mechanism should create an atmosphere of trust between the controller and the controlled person, clearly define the tasks of the audit, its timing and progress.

Another fundamentally new mechanism is the stimulation of conscientious behavior of organizations. The most understandable analogy is a discount on the payment of fines for breaking the rules. traffic. The introduction of such mechanisms requires legislative registration. But some steps can be taken now. We are accustomed to disseminating information about the negative side of state control: who violated what, who was held accountable, where the accident or poisoning occurred. Few people know about the economic entities that the state has checked and found no violations. At the same time, tools for informing consumers about market participants already exist and are used in the commercial sector. These are all kinds of ratings of hotels or restaurants (on-line resources: booking.com, tripadvisor.ru). Similar practices can be used in the work of control and supervisory bodies.

It is also proposed to introduce tools for pre-trial (out-of-court) appeal against actions or decisions taken by control bodies. This is also, in a broad sense, an element of preventive work. Since the institution of pre-trial appeal is not regulated in Federal Law No. 294-FZ, in most cases, disputes with regulatory authorities are currently considered in accordance with Federal Law No. 59 “On the Procedure for Considering Appeals from Citizens of the Russian Federation” and the relevant provisions of administrative regulations. Only types of control with a serious industry legislative regulation have their own pre-trial appeal procedures. Classical examples are appeals against the actions of the tax authorities under the provisions of the Tax Code or appeals against the actions of the national accreditation body to the Appeals Commission under the provisions of the Federal Law “On accreditation in the national accreditation system”. Based on this, in the standard, taking into account the existing experience, judicial procedures, a certain mechanism for pre-trial consideration was described: who and what can appeal, in what time frame, what evidence should be, in what form the appeal is carried out. In the future, it is possible to introduce an electronic pre-trial appeal platform.

The standard fixes the main organizational stages of its implementation. First of all, we are talking about determining an official who coordinates preventive activities in the supervisory authority, adopting the procedure for organizing preventive work, approving a program of preventive measures, amending organizational documents (regulations on structural divisions, job regulations, etc.), as well as the finalization of the site.

The organization of a system of preventive work is the task of the head of the supervisory authority or his deputy. At the same time, I would like to emphasize that we are talking it is about the organizational component, the prevention itself, that the inspector should deal with in the course of his daily control and supervision activities. It is impossible to artificially separate those who go for checks and those who are engaged in prevention.

A preventive orientation should be inherent in the very control and supervision activities, have an "inclusive" character.

In addition, preventive measures should be included in the documents of the supervisory authority. For example, provisions on the management of control should be incorporated into the job descriptions of inspectors.

Finally, each control and oversight body should adopt two guiding documents: the procedure and the prevention program. The procedure should contain a list of types of information that is collected for planning and organizing preventive work, the resources used for its conduct, the procedure for analyzing, assessing and forecasting the state of the controlled environment, monitoring the implementation of the departmental prevention program, interacting with territorial authorities on the implementation of preventive measures etc.

The program of preventive work is already being adopted in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Law No. 294 "On the protection of the rights of legal entities and individual entrepreneurs in the exercise of state control (supervision) and municipal control." In 2018, regulatory authorities will need to incorporate the provisions of the Standard into it. A departmental prevention program, as a rule, may include an analysis of the current state of the controlled environment, the main goals and objectives of preventive activities, taking into account the specifics of the type of state control, approaches to the classification of controlled entities, a list of preventive measures, the timing of their implementation, the target audience, indicators of the completeness and quality of the program implementation.

The development of the preventive component of control and supervision activities does not occur at once. We need to move quickly, but consistently. To do this, a general approach has been adopted, associated with the transition of authorities between the conditional "levels of maturity" of their departmental systems, whether it be risk management systems, performance or efficiency assessment systems, or, as in this case, preventive measures organization systems. Based on this, the standard proposes three levels of development of departmental prevention systems.

In 2017-2018, the zero level of maturity is reached. It involves the placement of lists of legal acts containing mandatory requirements, measures to inform controlled entities, including through the preparation of guidelines for compliance with mandatory requirements, generalization of typical and mass violations of the law, introduction of the practice of issuing warnings about the inadmissibility of violations of mandatory requirements into the activities of the control body, and as well as his use of checklists. In other words, this level involves the full use of existing and legal instruments.

In 2018-2019, there is a transition to the first level of maturity of departmental prevention systems. At this stage, all these instruments are differentiated according to the types of controlled entities and are periodically reviewed.

The meaning of the first level of maturity is the adaptation of prevention tools to the characteristics of controlled entities. It is obvious that different groups of controlled subjects need a different approach, taking into account not only the characteristics of their legal status(that is, an objectively existing differentiation of mandatory requirements), but also characteristics that describe their activities, the history of their legal or illegal behavior.

Fire supervision in the residential sector is one approach that industrial enterprise- the other, and in the hairdresser's - the third. With a consistently conscientious controlled entity, they work in one way, with a person who systematically violates the law - in another way. This will allow you to reach a more precise and from this more effective approach to preventive measures. It also becomes clear that the adaptation of prevention tools means their periodic review, taking into account the changing characteristics of controlled entities, the development of a system of mandatory requirements for their activities, the results of control measures, and so on.

Starting from 2019, a transition to the second level of maturity of departmental prevention systems is planned. It involves finer tuning of preventive measures. In addition to the formal characteristics of controlled entities, which are already taken into account at the first level of maturity, the control body proceeds to assess and predict their behavior. It breeds new class questions - what motives controllable entities are guided by, what incentives affect them or can affect them, what is their business model, history of behavior, features of the industry in which they operate, relationships with counterparties, place in the market, and much more. A certain typification of the indicated results of analytical work leads to a qualitative transition from disparate attempts to influence behavior specific person to the impact on the segments of the controlled environment that are susceptible to a certain type of control and supervision activity.

As a result, the boundary between prevention and verification should disappear. In fact, we are talking about the fact that the control body chooses, within certain legislative frameworks, adequate tools to influence the market in order to achieve socially significant results. The results of control and supervision activities become decisive when changing documents strategic planning, revision of the regulatory legal regulation relevant areas of public relations.

It is this approach that will ultimately allow us to talk about a qualitative change in the system of state control, the transition to the principles of "smart regulation" in its construction.

The project committee of the priority program "Reform of control and supervisory activities" considered and approved the standard for comprehensive prevention of violations of mandatory requirements and considered it necessary to supplement it with interactive services, which should be legally fixed before May 1. Also, lists of performance and efficiency indicators were approved by types of state control (supervision) carried out by three control and supervisory bodies - Rostekhnadzor, FAS, FCS. Until October 31, all 12 supervisory agencies participating in the priority program must approve such KPIs by their orders. In addition, according to the checklists (checklists), it was decided to develop clear instructions on how to use them, and as they are implemented, it will be introduced transition period for job analysis. You can submit your proposals for working with checklists until December 15th. The meeting was chaired by the Minister of the Russian Federation for Open Government Mikhail Abyzov, who oversees the implementation of the reform of control and supervisory activities.

The standard for comprehensive prevention of violations of mandatory requirements was developed by the Ministry of Economics together with the Analytical Center under the government, experts and the Public and Business Council created under the project committee. All oversight agencies are encouraged to identify a deputy head responsible for prevention and amend their prevention-related documents based on what is proposed in the standard. The document itself will be shortened, supplemented with interactive services explaining how to use this standard and how to apply it.

It is necessary to prepare proposals for the development of federal and industry interactive services, prevention services for use by personnel and inspectors. Supervised entities should be able to use understandable presentation materials on how to use the standard, perhaps in the form of interactive pictures, because prevention for them is a reverse mirror of what we are doing here. Also, within a month, according to the standard, it is necessary to hold a general seminar-meeting with the participation of inspectors from federal and territorial supervisory authorities,” Mikhail Abyzov noted.

In addition, the minister recommended that by March 1, two bodies should be identified, where literally in manual mode a standard will be applied to assess the quality of its implementation. Thus, before May 1, it is necessary to make the necessary changes and additions to the standard and fix it accordingly, the minister explained.

The lists of performance indicators were discussed in detail with experts and working groups of the Public and Business Council, which include entrepreneurs and officials. It was decided to further study certain comments, for example, comments regarding the list of the Ministry of Internal Affairs with an indicator in the field of road safety: in particular, the agency opposes inclusion in the indicators material damage from traffic accidents, since the determination of damage from an accident is part of the work of insurance companies, and the internal affairs bodies do not have relevant statistics.

Minister Mikhail Abyzov, in turn, recommended that the project committee prepare proposals on this issue, taking into account sectoral and interdepartmental statistics.

We need to look and analyze what information Rostransnadzor has access to. In any case, it is necessary to move in this direction, because now the entire insurance system is becoming transparent. It would be good to hold a discussion on the basis of the Ministry of Internal Affairs related to departmental statistics, with the boundaries of responsibility, interdepartmental definition of risks, with the participation of consumers of this supervision and regions where primary statistics are recorded,” suggested Mikhail Abyzov.

On the issue of legal acts fixing the use of checklists, it was decided at the initial stage to introduce a transitional period for businesses and controllers to give them the opportunity to familiarize themselves with the forms of checklists in order to avoid risks.

Until July 1, 2018, all supervisory activities in relation to business must be translated into checklists, which will be previously published in an open and understandable format. After each translation, if necessary, a transitional period for understanding can be set. From October 1, we are launching the first batch of checklists, according to which the first supervisory authorities will begin to check. We will carefully analyze this experience, the next batch of checklists will start on January 1. At the same time, at any time until December 15, additional proposals can be made to the forms, this will be dealt with by the Public and Business Council and the Ministry of Justice,” Mikhail Abyzov supported the idea.

Rospotrebnadzor and the Ministry of Emergency Situations are the only supervisors that conveniently decomposed the checklists according to the nature of the supervised economic entity, each with its own checklist: a hairdressing salon - a checklist, trade - a checklist, catering - a checklist. This is how the picture should ideally look. Not all supervisions can do this, but we must strive for individualization,” the minister stressed.

In his opinion, what these departments have done with respect to supervised entities is exactly how work on checklists should look in the future.

Everything here must be computerized: the supervised object enters the profile, fills out a questionnaire of 15 questions, identifies itself, and receives a checklist of the requirements that it must meet. And all this is done online. It is necessary to transfer the entire base of requirements to the information rails,” Mikhail Abyzov added.

By a protocol decision, the control and supervisory authorities were instructed to finalize the checklists according to the available comments, and also, when introducing checklists, conduct a monthly analysis of their application to identify facts of excessive administrative pressure, outdated and redundant mandatory requirements, followed by amendments to the checklists. The analysis of relevant activities will be carried out by the Analytical Center under the Government.

The experts once again drew the attention of the heads of oversight agencies to the need for intradepartmental work with the inspectors and with territorial bodies, explaining the procedure for law enforcement of checklists.

The Minister of the Russian Federation turned to the Analytical Center under the Government with a proposal to develop simple, understandable instructions for this purpose, presentations on the procedure for using checklists, and each department should have these instructions. In addition, the authorities, together with the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications, need to consider the possibility of using modern IT solutions when working with checklists in order to ensure transparency and increase convenience for both the audited entities and inspectors.

In conclusion, the project committee reviewed and approved the roadmaps for updating, optimizing and canceling mandatory requirements in the areas of civil aviation, retail and food production. However, the experts came to the conclusion that in these documents there is a problem of requirements: there are both technologically and obsolete requirements.

According to the Secretary of State, Deputy Minister of Justice of the Russian Federation Yuri Lyubimov, some of the cards are very expensive for the business community. For example, Lyubimov says, an outdated requirement in the field of licensing alcoholic beverages, where, according to the calculations of the Ministry of Justice, savings can amount to more than 1 billion rubles a year. Or the point of changing the procedure for working with biological waste by clarifying the regulatory characteristics of biological waste, which were supported by the Rosselkhoznadzor - here the savings on retail chains will amount to more than 4 billion rubles a year, the Deputy Minister emphasized.

In turn, Mikhail Abyzov stressed that this is the first experience of working with mandatory requirements.

All draft road maps have been sent to the Public and Business Council.

The priority program "Reform of Control and Supervisory Activities" is included in the number of projects that are being implemented at the site of the Council under the President for strategic development and priority projects. The passport of the priority program "Reform of Control and Supervisory Activities" was approved at a meeting of the Presidium of the Presidential Council for Strategic Development and Priority Projects, which was held on December 21 under the chairmanship of the Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Dmitry Medvedev. The passport of the priority program defines three key goals of the reform: reducing damage to state-controlled risks, reducing the administrative burden on business, and improving the quality of the entire state control system. The document also spelled out the target results of the reform in relation to specific deadlines.

The reform of control and oversight activities has already begun to bring the first positive results. For a number of types of control (supervision), criteria have been developed for classifying subjects of state control (supervision) as risk groups as part of the implementation of a risk-based approach, as a result of which, starting from 2018, the frequency scheduled inspections will depend on the degree of danger of the object and the likelihood of harm. For federal executive authorities - project participants, performance and efficiency indicators are approved, aimed at reducing the number of dead and injured, and reducing material damage.

For a number of federal executive authorities - project participants, starting from October 2017, the obligation to use checklists (checklists) during scheduled inspections comes into force. In this case, the subject of verification is limited to the requirements set forth in the checklist. In parallel with this, the work of expert working groups, together with interested federal executive authorities, the Ministry of Justice, continues to revise mandatory requirements in order to abolish redundant, outdated and duplicate requirements.

Minister Mikhail Abyzov, together with the heads of federal executive authorities, territorial federal executive authorities, heads of constituent entities of the Russian Federation, held a large number of public balance events on issues of law enforcement practice.

On October 11 this year, a seminar was held on the implementation of the Standard for Comprehensive Prevention of Violations of Mandatory Requirements, chaired by the Minister of the Russian Federation for Open Government Mikhail Abyzov. The event consisted of speeches by representatives of the central offices and territorial departments of departments participating in the Reform of control and supervision activities. Federal Service on Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance at the seminar was represented by the Head of the Service Sergey Dankvert .

The standard for comprehensive prevention of violations of mandatory requirements was approved in September by the project committee for the reform of control and supervision activities. It fixes the principles of the transition from the “stick” system to the partner one, from identifying violations that have already occurred to preventing them. The standard provides for the placement of checklists in the public domain - lists of control questions that inspectors use during inspections; advising entrepreneurs and holding public "balance" events following the results of inspections; encouraging conscientious entrepreneurs; introduction of a pre-trial dispute resolution procedure, as well as the use of tools public control effectiveness of control and oversight bodies.

Mikhail Abyzov noted that a number of control and oversight bodies had previously used some prevention tools, however, an integral system of preventive measures, which would include training of personnel in the prevention of violations, elements of analyzing the effectiveness and efficiency of preventive measures, - in state system there was no control and supervision either at the federal or at the regional level.

“At the same time, international practice, and our common understanding of the tasks of the reform of control and supervision shows that the balance of control and supervisory activities related to the verification of compliance with mandatory requirements, and the balance of preventive measures aimed at preparing and training supervised entities to work to fulfill these requirements should significantly shift towards prevention. A year ago, according to our measurements, this balance was 90-95% in favor of the usual control measures for us, and only 5-10% were associated with preventive measures. Now our task is to radically change this balance. In the near future, for the next 3 years, the share of preventive work in the work of the inspectors should be more than 50%,” the minister said.

According to Mikhail Abyzov, the nature of the relationship between supervisors and subjects is becoming a partnership. This is facilitated, among other things, by holding monthly discussions of law enforcement practice in the territorial bodies of federal departments, in which inspectors, entrepreneurs and regional authorities participate. The main task is not to reveal and punish, but to prevent violations, eliminate the risk of damage and harm to life and health, the minister stressed. To do this, it is necessary to explain to the business the intricacies of the regulatory framework containing the requirements.

Mikhail Abyzov recommended that the prevention standard be additionally presented in the format of “funny pictures”, infographics, visualized and made understandable for inspectors and heads of terrorist organizations. The minister noted that much attention will be paid to training employees of supervisory authorities in preventive work.

“This year we are launching a large program to train leaders of terrorist agencies and inspectors. A very ambitious task has been set for the next year - to train more than 25,000 inspectors remotely through a single training platform. To educate is not to force them to watch some presentations. This means conducting certification and questionnaires that would show how effective this training is. The main thing is to make this tool not theoretical, but as practical as possible,” Mikhail Abyzov emphasized.

Supervisory agencies need to develop annual programs for the prevention of violations, said, in turn, the head of the department for supervision over the observance of the rights of entrepreneurs of the Prosecutor General's Office, Alexei Pukhov. These programs should not repeat what was written a year ago, they should change taking into account established practice, he pointed out. The Prosecutor General's Office, he said, will monitor compliance with the provisions of the standard.

The best practices of the supervisory authorities on the prevention of violations will have to be posted on the portal of the reform of control and supervision activity control-supervision.rf.

“A base should appear on this resource best practices for prevention. It is necessary to oblige the supervisory agencies to collect on their own territorial bodies 5-7 best practices and upload them to the site. This will serve as a motivation for other supervisory authorities,” Mikhail Abyzov believes.

He also suggested holding a competition during the year among employees of state control bodies and awarding government diplomas to those who distinguished themselves in carrying out preventive measures.

The minister also spoke in favor of reviving the Soviet culture of posting posters on compliance with safety rules in various areas and showing relevant videos in public places.

The head of the Rosselkhoznadzor, Sergei Dankvert, in turn, spoke about the problem of "state regulation that does not regulate." Often the punishment for violations, according to him, is minimal, and the losses are disproportionately large. He also proposed to analyze the effectiveness of the RIA procedure, which, according to him, can be used as a tool for corruption and lobbying.

"We have to regulatory framework make it so that we have a complete toolkit. Control must be reasonable and transparent so that we, on the one hand, ensure security, and on the other hand, do not form elements of abuse, corruption and administrative pressure. We need not weak control, not repressive control, but smart control. Everyone should turn on their heads,” Mikhail Abyzov concluded.

The document was prepared by the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia jointly with representatives of the expert community and federal executive authorities as part of the implementation of the passport of the priority program "Reform of Control and Supervisory Activities", approved on December 21, 2016 following a meeting of the Presidium of the Council under the President of Russia for Strategic Development and Priority Projects. He summarized the existing experience of preventive work of control and supervisory agencies, foreign experience, as well as methodological documents developed within the framework of the subcommittee on optimizing control and supervisory functions.

According to Deputy Minister economic development RF Savva Shipov, the main goal of the standard is to ensure the systematic implementation of preventive measures in the current activities of control and supervisory authorities.

“Prevention should become an integral part of the work of any inspector, since the currently adopted “punitive” model of control and supervision does not allow to effectively solve the problem of protecting socially significant benefits. The standard we have developed contains a new concept for the implementation of the regulatory and protective functions of the state, which provides for the prevention of violations of mandatory requirements and the widespread involvement of business entities in management processes", - said the Deputy Minister.

In addition to the already existing preventive measures, which are regulated by Federal Law No. 294-FZ, the standard provides for a number of new tools. Among them are measures aimed at stimulating good faith behavior, informing about control procedures, developing interactive services and applications aimed at business representatives, and much more.

“The standard is characterized by maximum complexity, detail and illustration. It is not simple beautiful book, which you can post on the site and forget about it, and the tool real work controller, systematizing all forms of preventive work in one place,” Savva Shipov explained.

One more distinguishing feature standard - its dynamism: it will be finalized and supplemented as legislation develops and the practice of applying preventive measures accumulates.

The standard applies to all control and oversight bodies that participate in the implementation of the program to reform control and oversight activities (Ministry of Internal Affairs, Ministry of Emergency Situations, Federal Antimonopoly Service, Federal Tax Service, Rosselkhoznadzor, Rospotrebnadzor, Roszdravnadzor, Rostransnadzor, Rosprirodnadzor, Rostrud, Rostekhnadzor and FCS). In addition, the document can be used by other federal executive authorities, as well as controllers at the regional and municipal levels.

At the first stage, these departments participating in the priority program will have to adopt a prevention program for 2018, determine an official responsible for the implementation of preventive measures at the level not lower than the deputy head, and adopt guidelines governing the organization of internal preventive work.