Can newborns be photographed? Basic rules for photographing babies at home. At what age is it better to shoot a baby under one year old? Why you can't take pictures of children under 6 months old

Why not take pictures of newborns? Where do these myths come from?

Such a ban has really existed for many years, and almost every family where a baby has recently appeared will have relatives or friends who actively advocate the need to comply with it. Arguments are usually given as follows: infants from time immemorial should not be photographed or painted, and if the ban is violated, the consequences can be dire.
However, in reality, this superstition is not at all as ancient as it might seem. Our ancestors did not portray babies, not because it was forbidden. Secular painting long time did not exist at all, therefore, not only babies were not depicted, but, in principle, ordinary people, only religious subjects were allowed.

But the superstition forbidding photographing babies really existed. It is because of him that, even today, many refuse to conduct a photo shoot of a newborn. The ban was associated with the belief that if you take a photo, the child will soon die. The same taboo existed with regard to photographing pregnant women.
However, let's not forget that photography appeared in the second half of the 19th century, at a time when the situation with maternal and child mortality and without it was not very good. Especially often, representatives of the upper classes died during childbirth and gave birth to dead children, whose body was unaccustomed to stress and physical work. But photography was expensive and was not at all available to peasant women and poor townspeople. In addition, no one kept accurate statistics on how many children died in infancy after being photographed. Therefore, we no longer know how a visit to a photo studio really affected the health of a young mother and baby. But they are afraid of this negative influence today, when thousands of parents around the world take pictures of their children in the delivery room, it is definitely not worth it.
Another source of such prohibitions is the tradition not to show the baby to strangers for at least one and a half months, or, to be more precise, up to 40 days old. Allegedly, at this time, the newborn is especially susceptible to damage, the evil eye, etc. Everyone decides whether or not to believe in such a theory, but it is worth admitting that today it is unlikely that it will be possible to fully comply with this tradition. The newborn today is in contact with a large number of medical personnel still in the maternity hospital, then a pediatrician visits him and nurse, and when he turns one month old, his mother brings him to an appointment at the children's clinic. In addition, earlier in 40 days a baptism was performed, today many baptize older children, others do not carry out baptism at all.

therefore photo session of a newborn today it does not harm the condition of the newborn, but each family decides on their own what to do with the photographs. If you wish, you may well not show these pictures to strangers and simply save them in your family archive, as a memory of this important and touching time.

There is such a belief, known since ancient times, which says that in no case the sleeping state of people of any age should be photographed or captured in any other way categorically! Because of this, many masters of this art do not practice photographing sleeping people. Why in general and who needs such a memory?

The first superstitions associated with the photograph of a sleeping person

A large percentage of non-superstitious individuals are trying to find the best answers to their questions. What is the reason for the superstitions about pictures of sleeping people is unknown. of people? At the beginning of the 19th century, a very popular pastime among the past generation was the imprinting of a deceased person in the form of a sleeping person. Such perpetuation was considered fashionable and widely used. In addition, a deceased person was not filmed in a coffin as a deceased. In the photograph, everything should have looked as if the person had fallen asleep and were fast asleep. Various poses (even sitting on a chair), formal, beautiful clothes and the necessary interior to create an atmosphere were required for this. And they were at that time almost all people who have lost loved ones or relatives. Photographers among themselves called these albums "books of death." It's creepy and scary at least!

Features of our time

For us today, such tricks are considered wild and to some extent cruel in relation to the deceased. Perhaps, it is with this period and moments that the custom is connected not to capture people asleep. Because immediately there is an association with death, which you do not want to call.

Another of the options for why it is impossible to photograph sleeping children, many call the fact that it is possible for a posing person to call upon himself trouble and soon tragically and unexpectedly die. Thus, it is as if a call to death is being made from the side of the sleeping person shown in the photo.

Superstition and predictions

It is believed that a sleeping person is just a physical body that the soul left for a while. Previously, the state of sleep was called "small death." This meant that when photographing such a person, the soul was not able to protect him from the evil influence of otherworldly forces. As a result, the body was negatively affected by poor energy.

It used to be very strong, in the opinion of the society of the past times, the negative impact mystical forces the children succumbed. As a result, the mystical concept of why it is impossible to photograph sleeping children appeared. Such a picture is fraught with a lot of different information that in the literal sense of the word can be used against a posing person.

Damage through photography

It was believed that from the moment the shooting appeared, magicians, sorcerers, shamans inaugurated curses, damage precisely with the help of photography. It was assumed that images of sleeping people would be more successful for the sorcerer to use it in rituals. Why be exposed to danger and negative influence? If you believe everything that happened in the deep past, you can draw certain conclusions as to why sleeping children should not be photographed. In modern times, in almost all cities on the planet, there are still a large number of various fortune-tellers and psychics conducting various kinds of rituals using images of people. Although, it would seem, we live in the era of the greatest scientific discoveries, with the maximum level of enlightenment in questions that previously interested humanity and unexplained phenomena.

Photography - a large flow of information and energy

People with supernormal abilities (magicians, psychics, esoterics) with the help of photography can tell you fully and in detail about the past, present, and even tell the future. At least, this is the opinion of the skeptical part of the population of our planet. And this means that whatever photograph may be, it still retains all the bioenergetics of the person who is depicted on it. Such a small particle, with the help of which you can cause irreparable harm to the person himself or to his health. If you also come across such a picture, which depicts a sleeping person, then in this case his fate becomes more pliable and sensitive to an unexpected incident or situation.

Answers on questions

Having received such a volume of necessary information about why it is impossible to photograph sleeping children, one can come to certain conclusions. After all, children's energy, according to psychics, is much weaker than that of adults. It also gives us an answer to the question of why sleeping people should not be photographed. The right in the decision is given to you, whose words and legends to believe and what to resort to.

Contemporary views on photography superstition

Although they are not such superstitious personalities as a hundred years ago, they still do not allow taking photos of their children in the process of sleep. The answer to the question of whether it is possible to photograph sleeping children will be different from everyone to whom you ask it. After all, each person perceives and reacts to circumstances in different ways.

Sleeping babies and taking pictures are incompatible

A small child is very sensitive during sleep, and the slightest rustle can bother, scare him or even wake him up. Babies and babies have not yet formed their biofield and energy. If you believe the signs, then these are the cards that are the most sensitive and vulnerable in unfriendly hands. A bright flash from the camera, clicks and typical sounds can be a great scare for a child when you try to capture him in an interesting position. From this it immediately becomes clear why it is impossible to photograph a sleeping child. Because of one cute shot, you can disentangle the consequences for more than one hour, especially if your child suddenly woke up in a bad mood or, even worse, got scared.

You don't need to be superstitious and believe in all the predictions in order to understand why you can't take pictures of sleeping people, signs are a powerful thing. They did not arise just like that, but were formed over the years by many people. And even if you are indifferent to your personal fate, then you should definitely worry about the health and future of your child right now. This is especially important if there are evil and unscrupulous people in your environment who are capable of causing harm by sending various kinds of curses or evil eyes on your child.

Why it is impossible to photograph a sleeping child, probably, everyone who has already read the information and arguments in this regard, given in the article, has already understood. Sticking to these stereotypes or doing your own thing is up to you. But it is best to be more careful once, and still follow banal prompts, than to regret the troubles arising from negligence and excessive skepticism later.

Is a sleeping person photogenic?

If you really believe in the fact that a person is completely defenseless during sleep, then this is a good reason why you should not be photographed asleep at all. Not even every master will undertake to conduct a session with a sleeping person, unless for an experiment, a joke or a collection. Based on the facts and theory, it is possible to preliminary summarize why it is impossible to photograph sleeping people, children, including:

• These photos do not always come out well, as the person is not in the mood for shooting.
• The likelihood of the shot falling into the hands of a bad person.
• A banal, albeit superstitious way to protect yourself from evil eyes and damage.

Take photos in huge numbers, because they are the main source of memories associated with pleasant moments. But still try to avoid those where you or your children sleep. Even in every lie there is a small grain of truth. You don't have to play with fate. It is better to skip a beautiful shot once, rather than cry afterwards about the unpleasant incident that happened.

No matter how great the desire of the parents is, to capture the sweetly snoring baby, you shouldn't do this, because you can't take pictures of sleeping children! Among the reasons explaining this prohibition there are absolutely logical arguments that appeared as a result of many years of observation of various phenomena.

Camera lye or flash can scare the guardian angel

But there are also theories based on the ancient superstitions of illiterate people, they are not subject to rational thinking. However, it is worth knowing about all the opinions so as not to harm the dearest thing you have.

Why not take pictures of sleeping children?

There is a theory that during sleep the soul leaves the human body and enters a parallel world. At this time, it is dangerous to photograph a child.

1. There is a great risk of causing great harm to his mental health. In support of these thoughts, many photographs of sleeping people were taken, in which a white spot is visible next to the person - this confirms the fact that the soul is separated from the body.
2. And there was also a superstition that the sleeper might not wake up. After all, the soul returns to the body only at the moment of natural awakening. And if you wake up a child with a click of a camera or a flash of light, the soul will not have time to return or may "deteriorate". Even an awakened person will never be the same again. Moreover, the fragile soul of children has not "worked out" the mechanism of quick return.

Loss of the Guardian Angel

The lye of the camera or the flash can scare the guardian angel, who will leave his little master unprotected, because she will fly away in excitement. Of course, this will not lead to death, but the baby will start to hurt, and troubles will happen to him.

In Christian teaching, nothing is said about the fact that an angel can leave his ward unprotected, and there are no prohibitions on photographing children.

But according to Islamic traditions, it is not allowed to paint portraits and photograph even adults or animals. But modern Muslims often ignore this prohibition.

The opinion of psychics

A sleeping baby should not be photographed, because a person's bioenergy field, which is vulnerable during sleep, is reflected in the photo. If the picture falls into the hands of skilled ill-wishers, they can damage or jinx the child. The aura of babies is pure, but completely defenseless.

It is no wonder that any beginning evil magician can harm the baby. For this reason, it is not recommended to show photos of even waking little children to strangers. However, even a close person can jinx a child from a photograph.

And you also can't throw away, tear or burn baby photos - this can also damage the baby's fragile aura.

Hypnos and Thanatos are twin brothers

In myths Ancient Greece the gods of death (Thanatos) and sleep (Hypnos) are designated as twins. The Slavs also noticed the similarities between death and sleep. One might think of a deceased person that he is asleep (lying motionless, eyes closed).

Therefore, it was believed that photographing a sleeping person brings death closer. There is a sign: if the photo turned out to be blurry, this meant the imminent death of the person in the picture. This fuzziness meant:

• The presence of a hidden serious illness.
• Trouble coming.
• Rapid demise.

A sleeping baby should not be photographed, because a person's bioenergy field, which is vulnerable during sleep, is reflected in the photo.

Terrifying tradition

The ban on photographing sleeping people (especially children) appeared in the 19th century. When photography appeared, it was fashionable in Europe to take pictures of deceased relatives. During their lifetime, people were not photographed, because this service was expensive.

But after his death, relatives invited a photographer to photograph the deceased as a keepsake for posterity. Sometimes the deceased was photographed at a table, surrounded by children and grandchildren, or the deceased was put into bed, and made him look asleep. Such a photo was distinguished by the fact that the “model” had her eyes closed.

Every wealthy family had an album of photographs, informally called the "book of death." They said about the deceased that "he blinked at the photo" or "he was sleeping." So there was a bad omen that taking pictures of a sleeping person is to predict a quick death for him.

"Stolen Destiny"

There is a superstition: when a sleeping child is photographed, his health and a happy fate are robbed. The larger the photo is taken, the larger is the size of the stolen. This rule especially applies to newborn unbaptized babies who are without the protection of the Higher Powers and do not resist external influences.

And it is forbidden to photograph unbaptized children, not only in a dream, but also while awake. Children are baptized on the fortieth day from the date of birth (at this moment mothers can attend church). But even after such a measure, the old-timers do not recommend bringing photographers to the house from outside in order to avoid stealing the fate of the child.

It must be said that at the moment of photographing there is a special contact between the photographer and the “model”. A photographer has a very strong influence on a worried baby, he can convey to him some of his qualities. Therefore, it is very important that the camera is held in the hands of a person who does not have significant flaws.

In fact, you can photograph a sleeping baby, but you need to be careful. It is better to shoot the crumbs on the camera while awake in order to capture all the important events of life: picking up the first pyramid, timid steps, attempts to eat porridge on their own.

Such photography is absolutely safe for health, soul and guardian angel. But every moment that can be captured in early childhood is priceless. It is possible that looking at the photo of their sleeping child, after years, parents will be able to renew their quivering feelings in their memory.

The question "Isn't it harmful to photograph a child with a flash?" sooner or later arises in every family.

It happens, of course, that the amateur photographer running around with the camera does not even think about it - it is harmful, not harmful - just think, it blinked once. But even in such a situation, a "serious expert" (grandmother, uncle, neighbor, etc.) will certainly appear, who at best will express doubts: "are you sure that it is possible with a flash?" definitely: “what are you doing! with a flash of children it is impossible! ".

So the most main question :

IS IT POSSIBLE TO PHOTOGRAPH A CHILD USING A PHOTO FLASH?

Answer:

A CHILD OF ANY AGE CAN BE PHOTOGRAPHED USING THE FLASH WITHOUT ANY RESTRICTION.

As a matter of fact, that's all. If the topic worried and the answer satisfied, you can finish reading, grab your camera and run to take pictures.

For the curious and for those who want to know for sure where exactly this answer came from, we inform you that for today there are no scientific research, from which it follows that the use of a photo flash causes any health disorders in general and any problems with the organ of vision in particular .

I should note that in all situations when the doctor says “it is possible”, there will certainly be a parent-experimenter who will try to refute these words. In general, if you say that a banana is possible, then surely someone will feed the child for 3 days exclusively with bananas in order to prove that the doctor was mistaken.

With a photo flash, the situation is almost the same: you can always defeat common sense, turn off the light and in complete darkness run around the child with a flash, using the latter every two seconds. Well, after the child cries, confidently prove to the whole world the "obvious fact" that "these doctors do not understand anything about children's health."

Something, nevertheless, you need to know about the features of using a flash. And we are not talking about the retina of the eye, not about rods and cones, not about the spectral analysis of the radiation of modern flashlights - all this is interesting either to the most intelligent or especially inquisitive.

We are talking about phenomena that are completely earthly and understandable to everyone, we are talking about what everyone has experienced repeatedly. Obviously, no one gets any pleasure from the flash. It is also obvious that:

1. the darker the room, the more unpleasant the flash is (advice - turn on other light sources);

2. the closer to the face, the more unpleasant the flash (advice - keep a distance);

3. the more often the flash is used, the more it gets on the nerves (advice - know when to stop);

4. it is especially unpleasant when the flash and the direction of sight coincide (advice - use bounced light when technically possible).

These obviousness are taken into account by amateur photographers willingly or unwittingly: mothers and fathers do not like to photograph their own crying children, therefore, in a situation where the child's flash has gotten and scared, the photo session, as a rule, stops automatically until the child is completely calmed down.

But despite the seemingly obvious safety of the flash, this topic is constantly and vividly discussed in the “mother's” get-together. Both popular magazines and Internet forums are actively investigating the presence / absence of harm.

From my point of view, only professional photo studios are interested in the distribution of near-flash photography scares. Everyone wants to have a beautiful memory of childhood, and the more people are convinced of the harmfulness of a flash, the more people will come where there is a professional studio light and a master photo artist.

The truth looks different: the flash is not harmful, take pictures for health, but it does not hurt to occasionally please yourself and your relatives with high-quality professional children's photographs.

Moms and dads want the most beautiful photos of their child in the family album. However, many parents believe that this can be done only by contacting a professional photographer. After all, often poses for newborns are dangerous to their health, therefore, the creation of such personnel should be taken seriously, entrusting this business to professionals.

Often, parents are interested in the question "Is it possible to photograph a newborn if he is under 1 year old?" There are several superstitions that make many moms and dads reluctant to photograph babies. Some believe that photography can take a child's soul, others think that their newborn is so vulnerable to the evil eye, and still others are afraid to upload photos, fearing that the baby can be damaged.

Truth and myths

To be sure that the child is not in danger, you need to deal with all the superstitions that have come down to us from ancient times. It is worth knowing that once the era of photography was at its initial stage. For people, a device with a powerful flash, which takes pictures, seemed like something magical. It was the camera with its glass eye that smelled mysticism. For this reason, in ancient times, children were protected from this unit, worried that the child's soul would not be able to resist evil forces. However, photography is commonplace today.

If we rely on superstition and make a connection with Christianity, according to which baptism takes place on the 40th birthday of a child, it is generally accepted that during the first days of life, the baby is vulnerable, because a guardian angel has not yet been attached to him, protecting him from various damage and the evil eye. In the past, ancestors did not show newborn children to anyone until the baptismal process took place. Unsurprisingly, photography scares them off.

Despite all this, these myths have lost their relevance. The camera is not a "magic apparatus" and does not seem to be something terrible anymore. And a large number of other mothers and doctors see babies in the family house itself.

Newborn photography safety

When photographing babies, the first issue is the safety of the shooting. After all, the children's spine is still very weak. It is strictly forbidden to exert a large load on him when laying out individual poses. In addition, it is worth knowing about the harm that an outbreak can cause to a newborn:

• severe fright;
• negative impact on the retina of the eye;
• negative impact on vision.

However, not everyone agrees with this statement. Children's ophthalmologists said that the flash is completely harmless to the eyes of a newborn. Photographers, on the other hand, do not see the point in using flashes when shooting babies due to the fact that they give an ugly picture and can strongly illuminate the child's face, which will entail “wrong” shadows. Therefore, make sure that your baby is photographed without a flash.

Photoshoot for babies at home

Almost all moms and dads want to photograph their child and get amazing pictures. Parents have two ways:

• seek help from a professional photographer;
• try to do everything yourself by reading the necessary literature.

One way or another, in order to get beautiful shots at home, you need to follow some tips. The main point is the mood of the baby. If something hurts him, if he is hungry or dissatisfied, an easy photo shoot will not work.

In this case, it is necessary:

1. Get rid of negative factors that can spoil the baby's mood.
2. Create a comfortable environment for the child.
3. Provide the required temperature regime in the room where the shooting will take place.

If you can't calm the baby down, the shooting must be rescheduled for another day.

Preparing for a photo session

When you decide to shoot a baby, you should start by preparing the location for the shoot. A sofa, bed, baskets and frameless chairs are suitable for this. The process of photographing the crumbs involves the complete nudity of the baby. A beautiful diaper or soft towel should be spread over the place where the baby will be placed. Also, for shooting, you may need interior pillows and bolsters, with the help of which you will be able to lay the child in the desired position.

During a home photo shoot, you do not need to use bright colors that can draw all the attention to yourself. The central figure is the baby. To achieve this effect, it is recommended to use plain blankets and fabrics.

Make sure the baby is not cold. Warm up the room well before taking pictures, especially if photographing takes place in the winter season.

With the help of various props, you can get interesting shots. For this, various hats, ears and cute suits are suitable. For a newborn girl, angel wings, ribbons and flowers will be ideal props. For boys - hats and ties. Photos with soft toys look especially interesting. The more attractive the props look, the better the photos will turn out.

Today, many mothers love their children so much that they arrange photo sessions for them very often. All this speaks about their genuine feelings for their kids.

There are no related posts.