Entrepreneurship Advice: Effective Mechanism or Theater? Business Council Environmental issues from the mouths of large and small players in the MSW market

RESOLUTION

HEADS OF MUNICIPAL EDUCATION LENINGRAD DISTRICT

dated 16.01.2009, No. 28

village Leningradskaya

About the Business Council municipality

Leningradsky district

In order to implement public policy in the field of support and development of small business in the municipality of the Leningradsky district, in accordance with the Federal Law of July 24, 2007 No. 209-FZ "On the development of small and medium-sized businesses in Russian Federation", The Law of the Krasnodar Territory dated April 04, 2008 No. 1448-KZ" On the development of small and medium-sized businesses in the Krasnodar Territory ", in accordance with Article 23 of the Charter of the municipal formation, it was stated:

1. To approve the composition of the Entrepreneurship Council of the municipal formation Leningradsky District (Appendix No. 1).

2. To approve the Regulation on the Council for Entrepreneurship of the Municipal Formation Leningradsky District (Appendix No. 2).

3. The decree of the head of the Leningradsky district of February 7, 2003 No. 89 "On the Council for Entrepreneurship in the Leningradsky District" shall be considered invalid.

4. Control over the implementation of this resolution shall be entrusted to the first deputy head of the municipal formation V.G. Prokopets.

5. This resolution comes into force from the date of its signing and is subject to publication in the newspaper "Steppe Zori" and posting on the official website of the administration of the municipal formation of the Leningradsky District on the Internet.

Head of the Municipal Formation

Leningradskiy district S.V. Garkusha

APPENDIX

to the resolution of the administration
municipality
Leningradsky district
dated 07.06.2019 No. 452

"APPENDIX No. 1

APPROVED
by decree of the head
municipality
Leningradsky district
dated 16.01.2009, No. 28

COMPOUND

Entrepreneurship Council of the municipality
Leningradsky district

Gordienko Fedor Nikolaevich	Acting Head of the Municipal Formation, Chairman of the Council;
Sheredekin Alexander Nikolaevich	Deputy Head of the Municipal Formation, Deputy Chairman of the Council;
Mishnyakov Vladimir Ivanovich	Acting Deputy Head of the Municipal Formation, Head of Department Agriculture and Food Administration;
Troyanovskaya Tatiana Vasilievna	Head of Department economic development, consumer sector and information technologies municipal administration, secretary of the Council;
Alexander Anatolyevich	Head of the Department of Architecture and Urban Planning of the Administration of the Municipal Formation;
Sherstobitov Vitaly Nikolaevich	Head of the Department of the Consumer Market and Services of the Administration of the Municipal Formation;
Rita Grigorievna	Head of the Property Relations Department of the Administration of the Municipal Formation;
Aleksey Aleksandrovich	Director of LLC Lenkompleksinvest (as agreed);
Vladimir Alexandrovich	Head of KFH "Teply Stan" (as agreed);
Patrakov Vladimir Vladimirovich	Director of LLC "Zavety Ilyich" (as agreed);
Eremenko Nikita Alexandrovich	Director of Ermak LLC (as agreed);
Pavlogradskiy Igor Vasilievich
Karpenkov Eduard Vasilievich	Individual entrepreneur, head of farm (as agreed);
Sergey Nikolaevich	Individual entrepreneur, (as agreed);
Sexton Olga Alexandrovna	Individual entrepreneur (as agreed).
Salangin Artem Olegovich	Individual entrepreneur (as agreed);
Ponomarev Igor Nikolaevich	General director LLC "Leningradskiy karavai" (as agreed);
Alexander Alexandrovich	Founder LLC Firm "Juncker" (as agreed);
Drobakhin Sergey Valerievich	Director of Energocenter LLC (as agreed).

Acting

head of the municipality

Leningradsky district F.N. Gordienko

APPENDIX No. 2
APPROVED BY
by decree of the head
municipality
Leningradsky district
dated 16.01.2009, No. 28

POSITION

on the Council for Entrepreneurship of the Municipal Formation

Leningradsky district

1. General Provisions

1.1. This Regulation was developed in accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation, Federal Law of the Russian Federation dated July 24, 2007 No. 209-FZ "On the development of small and medium-sized enterprises in the Russian Federation", the Law of the Krasnodar Territory dated April 04, 2008 No. 1448-KZ "On the development of small and medium entrepreneurship in the Krasnodar Territory ", regulations Council of the Municipal Formation Leningradsky District and the Head of the Municipal Formation Leningradsky District.

1.2. The Entrepreneurship Council of the Municipal Formation Leningradsky District (hereinafter referred to as the Council) is a permanent advisory body formed to ensure the practical interaction of bodies local government and the population of the Leningradsky District municipality engaged in entrepreneurial activities, consolidating their interests to develop proposals on the main directions of entrepreneurship development on the territory of the municipality and participation in the implementation of the economic policy of the municipality.

1.3. The Council in its work is guided by the current legislation of the Russian Federation and this Regulation.

2. The main tasks of the Council

2.1. Preparation of proposals on the following issues:

A) the formation of new approaches to the development of entrepreneurship in the municipality of the Leningradsky District, their reflection in the municipal target program for the development and support of small business;

B) improving the interaction of public associations of entrepreneurs and business entities with local self-government bodies of the municipal formation of the Leningradsky District on the basis of transparency;

C) improving the regulatory legal framework of local self-government bodies regulating entrepreneurial activity in the municipality of Leningradsky District, including in the financial and credit, tax, property and investment spheres, as well as removing administrative barriers to the development of entrepreneurship;

D) expanding opportunities to improve the educational level of entrepreneurs;

E) creating conditions for the economic interest of business entities, attracting entrepreneurs and financial resources to solve social and economic tasks that are urgent for the municipality of Leningradsky District.

2.2. Promoting positive public opinion O entrepreneurial activity and structures that support the development of entrepreneurship in the territory of the municipality by disseminating the positive experience of business entities and relevant organizations.

2.3. Involvement of business entities in the development and implementation of state policy in the field of entrepreneurship development;

2.4. Promotion and support of initiatives aimed at implementing state policy in the field of entrepreneurship development in the municipality of Leningradsky District;

2.5. Conducting a public examination of drafts of regulatory legal acts of local self-government bodies of the Leningradsky District, regulating the development of entrepreneurship;

2.6. Attraction of citizens, public associations and representatives of funds mass media to the discussion of issues related to the implementation of the right of citizens to entrepreneurial activity, and the development of recommendations on these issues.

3. Council rights

3.1. To carry out the tasks assigned to it, the Council performs the following functions:

1) Makes decisions on issues considered at a meeting of the Council.

2) Develops and submits proposals for improving the regulatory legal acts of the municipal formation of the Leningradsky District on the elimination of administrative barriers that impede the development of entrepreneurship.

3) Attracts in established order to the work of the Council of Representatives of Sectoral (Functional) Bodies of the Administration of the Municipal Formation public organizations, small businesses, entrepreneurs without the formation of a legal entity.

4) Hears at its meetings the relevant officials on issues within the competence of the Council.

5) Requests information on matters within the competence of the Council from public authorities, other organizations and officials.
6) Interact with government authorities on issues within the competence of the Council.

7) Takes part in the development and implementation of the municipal target program"On the development of small business entities of the municipal formation Leningradsky district".

8) Submits proposals to regulatory legal acts in the form of projects on issues requiring a decision by the head of the municipality or the Council of the municipality.

9) Considers the issues of participation of business entities in district and settlement activities, determines the boundaries of this participation.
10) Submits proposals for the provision of financial and property support to business entities in priority areas of development.
11) Considers materials on violation of the current legislation of the Russian Federation in the sphere of the functioning of the consumer market and in terms of protecting consumer rights on the territory of the municipal formation Leningradsky District.

12) Considers appeals and proposals of legal entities and individuals on the implementation of entrepreneurial activities in the territory of the municipality of Leningradsky District.

13) Considers appeals on overcoming administrative barriers in the development of entrepreneurship, facts of unreasonable inspections, develops proposals for pre-trial settlement of disputes and disagreements that have arisen.

14) Provides control over the implementation of decisions made by the Council.

4. Composition of the Council

4.1. The council is formed from representatives of the municipal administration, heads of enterprises and organizations, reputable entrepreneurs.

4.2. The composition of the Council is approved by the head of the municipality.

4.3. The chairman and members of the Council work on the Council on a voluntary basis.

5. Organization of the Council's activities

5.1. The main form of the Council's work is meetings. The meetings are chaired by the Chairman of the Council, and in his absence - by the Deputy Chairman.

5.2. The council works on a permanent basis. Scheduled meetings of the Council are convened as needed, but at least once a quarter.

Unscheduled meetings of the Council are called by the Chairman of the Council, and in his absence - by the Deputy Chairman. The grounds for unscheduled meetings are reasoned proposals of the members of the Council with a list of issues proposed for discussion and the date of convocation.

5.3. Members of the Council participate in its work personally. A meeting of the Council is considered competent if it is attended by more than half of its members, including the Chairman of the Council or Deputy Chairman.

5.4. The decisions of the Council are taken by a simple majority of votes of the members of the Council present. In some cases, the decisions of the Council can be taken by poll. Decisions and recommendations of the Council on topical problems of entrepreneurship, by decision of the Council, are brought to the attention of the administration of the municipal formation Leningradsky district, the Council of the municipal formation Leningradsky district, financial management the Department for Finance, Budget and Control of the Krasnodar Territory in the Leningradsky District, the sectoral (functional) bodies of the administration of the Leningradsky District Municipal Formation and organizations according to the decisions taken.

5.5. The holding of the meeting of the Council and the decisions taken are reflected in the minutes of the meeting. The minutes are signed by the chairman and the secretary of the Council.

5.6. The responsibility for preparing and holding a meeting of the Council, as well as monitoring the implementation of its decisions, is assigned to the Secretary of the Council.

5.7. Chairman of the board:
1) manages the work of the Council;
2) holds meetings of the Council;
3) approves the work plans of the Council and reports on their implementation;
4) signs minutes and other documents adopted by the Council;
5) coordinates the activities of the working groups created by the Council.
5.8. Secretary of the Council:
1) prepares documents for consideration at a meeting of the Council;
2) informs the members of the Council on the issues of the activities of the Council;
3) keeps records of all documents, applications and other materials submitted to the Council for consideration.
5.9. Council members:
1) participate in the meetings of the Council;
2) make proposals to the work plan of the Council, as well as on issues related to the competence of the Council;
3) prepare conclusions on draft decisions of the Council;
4) make proposals for convening extraordinary meetings of the Council.
5.10. Control over the activities of the Council is exercised by the head of the municipal formation of the Leningradsky District.
5.11. The termination of the Council's activities is carried out by decision of the head of the municipal formation of the Leningradsky District.

First Deputy Head
municipal formation V.G. Prokopets

The council was formed in May 1990 in accordance with a tripartite agreement between the Moscow City Council, the Moscow City Executive Committee and the Moscow Union of Cooperatives.

The Council is a body of expert, informational and advisory support for the activities of the Mayor and the Moscow Government in the field of small and medium-sized business development.

The Council includes heads of various public associations, unions, associations of small and medium-sized businesses, support structures, scientists, reputable entrepreneurs, as well as advisers to the prefects of the administrative districts of Moscow on small and medium-sized businesses.

Objectives of the council: improvement of state policy in relation to small business in Moscow, research and generalization of the problems of small businesses, protection of legal rights and lobbying the interests of small business in the authorities of Moscow, improvement of the regulatory and legal framework of small business, attraction of entrepreneurs to the solution of the most important socio-economic problems of the city ...

The main directions of the Council's activities:

Organizes interaction with industry, professional and territorial associations, unions and associations of small and medium-sized businesses, other business structures.
Carries out constant interaction with the executive authority of the city of Moscow, authorized by the Moscow government, responsible for the support and development of small and medium-sized businesses in the city of Moscow, in order to develop coordinated decisions and improve state policy in the field of small and medium-sized businesses.
Interacts with departments, committees, prefectures of administrative districts of the city of Moscow and other executive authorities of the city of Moscow on the development and support of small and medium-sized businesses.
Involves representatives of the business community and entrepreneurs in the preparation of decisions of the executive authorities of the city of Moscow, in the development of measures to provide organizational, financial, material and technical and other assistance to small and medium-sized businesses, associations, unions, associations, and other non-profit organizations and support structures for small and medium-sized businesses.
Carries out preparation and public examination of drafts of legal acts of the city of Moscow, affecting the interests of small and medium-sized businesses.
Takes part in the prescribed manner in the development and implementation of federal, city, territorial and sectoral programs for the development and support of small and medium-sized businesses.
Takes part in the development of other city programs aimed at solving urgent social and economic problems of the city of Moscow, involving small and medium-sized businesses in the city of Moscow, their unions, unions and associations in their implementation.
Conducts an examination of projects and programs in the field of small and medium-sized businesses and recommends them for implementation.
Participates in the work of the executive authorities of the city of Moscow to provide property support to small and medium-sized businesses and organizations that form the infrastructure of support for small and medium-sized businesses, carried out in the form of transfer of ownership and (or) use of state property belonging to the city of Moscow, including the number of land plots, buildings, structures, structures, non-residential premises, equipment, machines, mechanisms, installations, Vehicle, inventory, tools, on a reimbursable basis, free of charge or on preferential terms.
It summarizes the opinions of entrepreneurs on topical issues of doing business and brings to the executive authorities of the city of Moscow the consolidated position of the business community on these issues.

To carry out its activities, the council:

Engages experts and consultants from among scientists, reputable entrepreneurs, representatives of government bodies and other specialists to work on the council;

Forms temporary and permanent creative teams, commissions, expert and working groups;

Requests and receives, in accordance with the established procedure, from departments, committees, prefectures of administrative districts of the city of Moscow, administrations of districts of the city of Moscow and other executive authorities of the city of Moscow, the necessary information, analytical, reference and statistical materials, as well as legal acts;

Interacts with public expert councils on small and medium-sized businesses at the prefectures of the administrative districts of the city of Moscow.

A serious discussion broke out around the expediency of holding a council on entrepreneurship in Tatarstan. Opponents note that more officials are present in the hall than businessmen, opponents deny this.

The main discussion about the Council on Entrepreneurship unfolded the day before in the Telegram channel "Failure". The authors noted that there were more officials than businessmen in the front ranks and even marked them with red dots.

Business Ombudsman Assessment Timur Nagumanov differs from the data in the photograph. In his department, more than 280 entrepreneurs were counted, including only about a hundred different officials.

"Red button for business"

The team of the Russian business ombudsman was the first to present its development Boris Titov who is running for President of Russia. Human rights defender Alexander Khuruji told about new system"Nabat", which is designed as mobile app for business. The developers decided to make Tatarstan a testing region. Thanks to the application, any entrepreneur will be able to press the "red" button, Titov's team will have to provide assistance to the business within 24 hours. First of all, this button solves the problem of sudden unscheduled inspections companies that are accustomed to sinning supervisory authorities.

In 2015, Khuruji himself ended up in jail because of a seemingly economic dispute between his company and the largest grid company in the Southern Federal District, IDGC of the South. The latter lost in the Arbitration Court the case against JSC "Energia" Khuruji and was forced to pay 500 million rubles. But, as is often the case in Russia, instead of settling the dispute peacefully, she decided to transfer the case to a criminal plane. Khuruji was accused of stealing those same 500 million rubles.

Then Titov personally stood up for the businessman. Therefore, for an entrepreneur from Rostov who has gone through fire, water and copper pipes, the issue of inspections and abuse by supervisory authorities is not only a good attempt to systematize work in Russia as a whole, but also a personal story.

The fact that such cases also appear periodically in Tatarstan is no secret to anyone. Now entrepreneurs will have a "red button", how effective it will be, time will tell.

Environmental problems from the lips of large and not so players in the solid waste market

This time there was a lot of talk about the waste management reform. In the near future, a regoperator should appear in Tatarstan, as well as in other regions. There will most likely be two of them in the republic. They will be responsible for garbage collection throughout Tatarstan. Most likely they will be RT-Invest and Mekhuborka.

On the eve of the meeting of the Council on Entrepreneurship, the director of "RT-Invest" Sergey Bogatov... According to him, from January 1, 2016, the fees should be paid not by entrepreneurs, as it was before, but by the landfills and regional operators themselves. Due to the fact that there is still no regoperator in Tatarstan, the payment for the negative impact fell entirely on the waste management companies, in fact, on landfills. The total cost of payment for a year in the republic is about 264 million rubles, which is one third of the total revenue of landfills.

Operators were able to roll over the abolition of fees for the negative impact on the transition period 2016-2017, it was assumed that during this time the MSW market reform would take place, but it stalled. In 2018, companies come with incomprehensible working conditions. Bogatov suggested supporting the amnesty for 2018 and advocating the differentiated rate, which the Ministry of Construction of Russia proposes to introduce.

The head of the state committee of the republic on tariffs answered Bogatov Marat Zaripov... He said that for 2018 the tariff for negative impact on the environment was not introduced, but it will be adopted as soon as the issue of the regoperator is resolved. Then this payment will fall on the shoulders of ordinary citizens. Minnikhanov asked where the head of the Ministry of Construction of Tatarstan, who is responsible for the choice of the regoperator, is. The official replied that the competition will be held in March 2018, and that the reform will be completed by the end of the year.

To change the situation with the payment of companies for 2018, the help of the State Duma deputies was needed to raise the problem at the federal level. There was a parliamentarian in the hall Fatih Sibagatullin who promised to settle everything.

Also director of the Povolzhskaya Ecological Company Olga Gudimova complained about the long registration of a license for waste management. Operators are required to obtain a license based on the federal waste classification catalog, but it is constantly changing, because of this, the procedure takes up to 200 days. It turned out that the problem had been resolved, so no instructions were given for this case.

We also talked about the absurdity in environmental reporting. It turned out that every year entrepreneurs must submit three reports to Rosprirodnadzor. The entrepreneurs proposed to combine the report and submit it at a time convenient for organizations.

Minnikhanov hinted that no one reads such a heap of papers in the department anyway, so it makes sense “to do some right things for the country”.

Entrepreneurs from the housing and communal services sector complained about careless tenants

They asked for protection from the President of Tatarstan and from ... tenants of apartment buildings, who filled up management companies with complaints. General Director of LLC "Brior + Kausaria" Kausaria Matrosova told how citizens seriously spoil the life of management companies.

According to her, instead of appealing to the Criminal Code, residents are accustomed to scribbling their complaints directly to the State Housing Inspectorate, although many issues can be resolved without involving a government agency. According to Matrosova, it gets to the point of absurdity - citizens demand to replace the light bulb through the State Housing Inspectorate.

The sphere of housing and communal services is rather closed for residents. Often, residents are simply denied complaints in a boorish manner and offered to call other phones. Despite the fact that the owner of an apartment building has an agreement only with the Criminal Code, residents are often asked to contact third-party phones. For example, in order to replace the notorious light bulb in the entrance, in Chelny you need to call Zhilenergoservis, with which not a single apartment owner has a contract.

And communal services must fulfill their duties themselves - it should be light in the entrances, regardless of whether there are complaints from tenants or not, and the State Housing Inspectorate allows you to set up any management company in a working way. Perhaps, it is precisely because of the efficiency of work with the government agency that more and more residents of the republic are turning to it, which naturally cannot be liked by public utilities.

Nevertheless, Matrosova offered a way out of the situation, which could suit the tenants. She believes that complaints can first go to management company, and not immediately to the supervisory authorities. There is a positive experience in this direction. We would suggest that the State Housing Inspectorate should secure control over the execution of complaints, which, if it is not executed, will come and fine the company.

One-stop shop principle for excursions for children

The entrepreneurs also talked about the bureaucracy in coordinating tourist trips for children. General Director of the "Tourist Information Center of Kazan" Natalia Abramovich said that after the well-known accidents, the procedure for coordinating children's travel has become too bureaucratic. According to her, in order to organize a trip, it is necessary to go through the approval of as many as five departments. As a result, the transportation of children on excursions has been sharply reduced. In Chelny, children have practically ceased to be taken on excursions, a drop of 95%, in Kazan at 40%.

Abramovich proposed to create a mechanism when it will be possible to coordinate a children's trip according to the principle of one window. According to the businessman, such proposals are already in the government of the republic for approval and are awaiting the president's signature. Minnikhanov asked where the document got stuck.

The head of the Tatarstan State Committee for Tourism, Sergei Ivanov, replied that the document "is being cleared up spelling errors." As a result, they promised to accept the document allowing to coordinate children's tourist trips in five days, and not in a month, tomorrow or the day after tomorrow.

The certificate of conformity is valid today, but not tomorrow

businessman

The Federal Accreditation Agency wakes up and decides to revoke the accreditation issued from the laboratory and cancel all issued protocols. The manufacturer does not know about this and is not trained to read the thoughts of the Federal Accreditation Agency. But the inspection authorities are informed of this, which unscheduled appear on the doorstep of the manufacturer and inform him of the disappointing news that he is a violator and must pay a fine and go through the whole procedure again. And, perhaps, soon to be punished again. And so on ad infinitum. There is one scapegoat in this tale. The one who needs the most is the manufacturer.

One of the most pressing problems for manufacturers was raised by an entrepreneur from Naberezhnye Chelny. Everyone knows that in Russia, in order to be able to sell their products, the manufacturer must receive a declaration of conformity with the requirements of the technical regulations of the Customs Union.

The negotiation mechanism is quite complex in itself. A businessman must apply to the Federal Accreditation Agency, get a list of accredited laboratories, hand over products and Required documents, pay for laboratory services, get a test report for their products, the manufacturer himself sends the protocol to the certification body, which finally issues a declaration. It seems everyone is happy, but not for long, notes Akulchev.

The entrepreneur lamented that there is no responsibility of the state body for the revocation of a license from a particular laboratory, therefore only the entrepreneur suffers from this, who, in fact, did not violate anything.

According to the entrepreneur, Rosakkreditatsiya unilaterally issues and revokes accreditations, and the certification body does not always check test reports. To break the vicious circle, it is necessary to distribute and consolidate responsibility at the legislative level.

President of Tatarstan

I believe that the entrepreneur, probably, should have somehow checked ... But, nevertheless, if the laboratory did not have the relevant documents, then it was not entirely correct to fine. It was necessary to give an opportunity, to warn, to say that the certificate is not valid. In general, this should not happen. If this laboratory has the appropriate documents, it should be held accountable, as well as the body that certified it. I am ready to appeal to the Russian government, to the State Duma

A discussion about the advisability of an entrepreneurship council started in the Telegram channel

Serious discussion unfolded in the Telegram channel "Neudascha". Unknown authors compared the meeting of the Council on Entrepreneurship under the President of Tatarstan with the Japanese kabuki theater.

Telegram channel "Failure"

The seventh expanded meeting of the Council on Entrepreneurship under the President of the Republic of Tatarstan has already taken place. Same - Nice picture, beautiful costumes, ritual and carefully calibrated performance. Like in Japanese kabuki theater. All roles are regulated - there is Tachiyaku - a wise, dexterous, powerful, attractive protagonist. The entire scenario is built around this character. There are also negative personalities - various Katakiyaku, bureaucratic officials, with whom they are trying to fight. Some are fought in absentia, and some are present in the hall. Each session, like in kabuki theater, is divided into acts that can be watched as a separate performance. An important place in it is occupied by the stage, which in a classical theater stands right in the middle of the hall. Each act is ritually unchanged - first the narrator (who is also the moderator) gives the floor to one of the specially trained noble men or the shogun, and he, entering the stage, begins his sad narration, which is accompanied in the kabuki theater by mournful music, and in our case, also video sequence: Somewhere again in the housing and communal services ordinary people are oppressed And this injustice obscures my views of Fuji After finishing the story, he leaves and all attention switches to the wise Tachiyaka. As befits a hero, Tachiyaku immediately delves into the problem and immediately delivers a verdict. At the same time, various Katakiyaku guilty of the problem are called on the stage, who, by tradition, mutter something guilty in their defense. But Tatiyaka cannot be fooled - an instruction to the negligent should be urgently corrected. Mournful music sounds again and then the transition to another act follows ... No need to say - a very original and folklore performance! This is only in Tatarstan and Japan. But, apart from the therapeutic and aesthetic effect, there must be something else! First, on the TV picture, only Katatiyaku officials are present near Tatiyaku. But, where, in fact, are the commoners-entrepreneurs? Why do they huddle at the back of the stage - even though the show is dedicated to them? Secondly, where are the reports on the results of past performances? After all, they have already been going on for two years - a lot of issues must be resolved. Moreover, this council met for the first time this year - the year of the Yellow Earth Dog, so just curiosity tears - and what was done last year of the Red Fire Rooster? But we believe that such meetings are still not a dogma, not an action once and for all frozen in the ritual framework, but a living organism that can change. Unlike the centuries-old kabuki theater.

The criticism voiced on the Telegram channel was answered in the office of the business ombudsman. According to the body, the meeting was attended by 276 entrepreneurs and 109 officials. The vast majority of the entrepreneurs present are active participants in the council's project groups. Those who, over the past three months, have proposed options for solving systemic business problems, have worked out options together with the authorities in the framework of meetings of project groups. The draft decisions, which are voiced by entrepreneurs at the council, are really well prepared. Above in order to present high-quality, detailed, effective solutions, businessmen, experts and representatives of government bodies have been working for months on the site of the council.

Nagumanov was accused of voicing prepared questions from pre-instructed businessmen at council meetings.

In the office of the business ombudsman, they answer that in order to prepare for the seventh meeting and develop decisions, entrepreneurs held more than 60 such meetings and conferences in the council, at each of which a decision was worked out. Most of the meetings were held at the "Headquarters" - on an open and convenient platform for communication between business and government, to which every entrepreneur has access. All entrepreneurs participating in the council meeting are representatives of small businesses. During the previous council meetings, speakers were: farmers and shopkeepers in villages, owners of small cafes, private kindergartens and medical clinics.